
BSc Software, Data and Technology at Constructor University Bremen
With full scholarship opportunities from the JetBrains Foundation
The first paragraph is not a warm-up; it’s an overview. In about 20 seconds, a reviewer should understand where you’re at, what you’re aiming for, and why this program fits your trajectory.
Use this formula: Background → Goals → Fit.
Be as specific as possible when telling us why you’re a good fit. Show how specific elements of the program match up with your learning style and goals.
Avoid low-signal openings, childhood biographies, praising the program, and vague statements of intent (“I want to be an awesome developer!”, etc.).
Opening template you can adapt:
I’m currently X (context).
Through Y (experiences), I realized Z (direction and motivation).
I’m now looking for A (next step), and this program fits
because B (specific aspects of the program that match your learning style and development goals).Claim → Evidence → Reflection template you can adapt:
Claim: I am good in ...; I have skills ...; I motivated in ... .
Evidence: I won ...; I created...; I have ... .
Reflection: It taught me ...; I like ...; I want to ...; I feel ... .Conclusion example (but don’t just copy this – be original!)
I’m choosing between Software Engineering and Machine Learning because I’ve tried both in projects and want deeper foundations.
I’d like to deepen my skills through coursework, projects, and a teaching assistantship.
I also hope to earn a JetBrains internship.I understand the target profile and selection criteria.
My opening uses the Background → Goals → Fit formula, and doesn’t simply offer a childhood bio or praise for the program.
I removed all the noise like buzzwords, fillers, and generic phrases.
Quality test: After each sentence, ask: “If I remove this sentence, do I lose useful evidence for the committee?”. If the answer is “not really,” it’s probably noise.
My conclusion contains 1 or 2 directions, along with reasons, a connection to experience, and a next step.